From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10629 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 01:35:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Aug 2004 01:35:32 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzQDj-0000KJ-JK for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:35:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 31028 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2004 01:35:31 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14393 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 01:35:31 +0000 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:35:30 +0000 From: Cory Visi To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040824013530.GA23968@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <412A9AFD.2030609@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <412A9AFD.2030609@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] development-sources are not 'development' X-Archives-Salt: 0651ddfc-69ea-4e6f-a90c-81186064761e X-Archives-Hash: fc4b1f2ec8663d5a094de1655b92ebf5 On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 09:33:49PM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote: > if we must keep the 2.6 kernels seperate, i suggest that we at least > change the name of the package. it's incredibly confusing to have your > stable kernel named 'development-sources' or 'gentoo-dev-sources', and > there are archs like amd64 that just dont support 2.4 in any way. plus > with the new change in kernel development, mm-sources has become the > official development tree. > > does anyone object to renaming development-sources to linux26-sources? > perhaps a similar name change for gentoo-dev-sources and > hardened-dev-sources? I object to version numbers in the package name. I wasn't around for linux26-headers, so I won't dig up that discussion, but I object to this. Thanks, Cory -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list