From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17001 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2004 18:08:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 23 Aug 2004 18:08:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzJEk-0004U2-Kh for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:08:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 26590 invoked by uid 89); 23 Aug 2004 18:08:05 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 18387 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2004 18:08:05 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:07:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200408231653.24708.mattam@gentoo.org> <200408231807.59679.carlo@gentoo.org> <200408231215.01924.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200408231215.01924.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200408232007.56373.carlo@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New local or global USE flags for sdl bindings: noimage & nomixer X-Archives-Salt: a5c92c8a-cdfb-473f-bfa7-b4358346976a X-Archives-Hash: fefc6112ab31178dbcf2b3ce12c332c3 On Monday 23 August 2004 18:15, Mike Frysinger wrote: > you can disagree all you want, there is no mechanism in portage to work the > other way, making local no* USE flags a neccessity I think the user has to care for local flags; This shouldn't be a problem, since they have descriptions. If you - and others - don't think so, then it would be better to add a flag after the description in use.local.desc, which indicates the default, instead continuing with this annoying enable-no-disable circus. Carsten -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list