From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20377 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2004 23:21:01 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Aug 2004 23:21:01 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bz1e0-0001CT-Vw for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:21:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 18995 invoked by uid 89); 22 Aug 2004 23:21:00 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5829 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2004 23:20:59 +0000 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 01:28:29 +0200 From: Matthieu Sozeau To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040822232829.GA19997@mattam.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200408212137.55920.mattam@gentoo.org> <200408221546.06172.mattam@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Gentoo Inc. X-URL: http://dev.gentoo.org/~mattam User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: examples X-Archives-Salt: 29176905-3ec5-41a2-951b-a8413c2b4b9b X-Archives-Hash: 5e0894eb923b8b09adcc9f9e9118a71d --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 03:12:54PM -0400, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wro= te: > On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Matthieu Sozeau wrote: >=20 > > as there are no strong objections (yet) to this proposal, i will add > > "examples - Adds examples (code, sample documents... NOT sample=20 > > configurations)" to use.desc tomorrow if no one complains. >=20 > I can see I wasn't clear enough before. You didn't follow up on the thread you started which turned out to advocate= =20 (at least I interpreted it this way) for a distinct 'examples' USE flag,=20 perhaps renamed, so I pushed a little :) > I object. The use of the "doc" use flag should cover the installation of > the example code in question. There is no need to add yet another global > use flag for this. What if examples was used like a doc subflag ? The point is that some people may want docs but not examples (if they know the API well for example) (and rarely examples but no docs i suspect) and it should be supported by ebuilds, if possible in a general way. What would you say if Karl or myself add 'examples' local USE flags for some ebuilds ? -- Matthieu --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBKSwdLp2DOi1vGpoRAu1nAJsHFl/4zaDKuXlnu+28lbiVbGOgBACggUdP uUVoHMSOgwwc57pok575VjM= =Lg9Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--