From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dynamic SLOTs
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:25:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408072025.09421.jstubbs@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408071207.32753.chrb@gentoo.org>
On Saturday 07 August 2004 20:07, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On Saturday 07 August 2004 00:57, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Even with all that, a full dependency tree is built with all circular
> > dependencies resolved in about 6 seconds, where currently emerge takes
> > about 2 seconds. I can't see a way to get USE-based SLOTs in without at
> > least doubling that figure (which is incidentally the time that 2.0.50
> > took). I'm open to suggestions on how to get around it.
>
> Maybe I'm not understanding this fully, but couldn't you just compute the
> dependency tree once and then cache it? And allow quick updates to the
> cached info by only editing dependency links for a single ebuild when it
> changes. You'd need to cache the dependencies for different sets of use
> flags as well.
The dependencies of a single package with a single set of conditions don't
take long to calculate. The issue is that, real soon, packages are going to
be able to specify some of those conditions for other packages. Figuring out
the best combination of packages/conditions and whether it is indeed possible
(ie. no conflicts) is what takes the time.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-07 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-31 4:09 [gentoo-dev] Dynamic SLOTs Jason Stubbs
2004-07-31 6:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-31 8:32 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-31 16:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-01 2:01 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-01 21:27 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-08-03 23:34 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-03 23:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-04 14:28 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-04 20:11 ` Aron Griffis
2004-08-04 23:47 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-05 1:45 ` Lina Pezzella
2004-08-05 13:57 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-05 3:00 ` Aron Griffis
2004-08-05 13:50 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-05 8:59 ` Ned Ludd
2004-08-06 3:10 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-06 11:45 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-09 23:35 ` Matthieu Sozeau
2004-08-10 12:21 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-10 12:53 ` Matthieu Sozeau
2004-08-10 13:37 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-06 11:56 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-06 12:41 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-06 15:18 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-06 17:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-06 23:57 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-07 10:42 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-07 11:07 ` Chris Bainbridge
2004-08-07 11:25 ` Jason Stubbs [this message]
2004-08-10 14:55 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-11 14:21 ` [gentoo-dev] Cross Compilation and Dynamic Slots Jason Stubbs
2004-08-11 16:17 ` Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
2004-08-12 13:12 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-08-12 12:42 ` [gentoo-dev] Cross Compilation and Dynamic Slots (ARCH_LIBDIR) Travis Tilley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408072025.09421.jstubbs@gentoo.org \
--to=jstubbs@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox