From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-14614-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 20069 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2004 15:12:50 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 15:12:50 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BqZ3x-0006MJ-Bk
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:12:49 +0000
Received: (qmail 31364 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2004 15:12:48 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 10366 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2004 15:12:48 +0000
From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:15:59 +0900
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.82
References: <1091093795.6180.6.camel@6-allhosts> <200407300819.49019.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <CF24DB52-E1C2-11D8-BB36-000A95C08860@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <CF24DB52-E1C2-11D8-BB36-000A95C08860@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200407310015.59055.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving functionality out of portage and into the tree
X-Archives-Salt: 52cf14ee-6e9b-4b0b-9f82-eae6df607980
X-Archives-Hash: 4a2b0e400c760dfe21270905360051a1

On Friday 30 July 2004 09:53, Brian Harring wrote:
> For commentary above, I've assumed you're talking about bash
> functionality- if you're referring to the scripts in bin/*, we've yet
> to bundle those w/ an installed ebuild.  Possible I spose, although
> again, that falls under another thread/bug; it would be an extension of
> portage's env snapshot code, and wouldn't care about where it got the
> scripts from, just as long as it could find them :)

I assumed that, with the moving of most of bin/*, everything would go into one 
(or more) eclass(es). At least, that seems the most convenient way to me. Do 
you have a fairly clear view in mind of exactly what would stay and what 
would be moved yet?

Regards,
Jason Stubbs

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list