From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22592 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2004 03:15:57 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 03:15:57 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BqNsB-00078v-57 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:15:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 5994 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2004 03:15:54 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26305 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2004 03:15:53 +0000 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:15:49 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040730031549.GA25543@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1091094759.6176.23.camel@6-allhosts> <200407291015.20390.vapier@gentoo.org> <410955B0.1030301@gossamer-threads.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <410955B0.1030301@gossamer-threads.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming repoman check will fail on large files in the tree X-Archives-Salt: d7635949-bb04-4683-8b7a-aa917f6705bd X-Archives-Hash: f46a5a518f7930ddc58f2e8bd2c19971 maillog: 29/07/2004-12:53:20(-0700): Jason Rhinelander types > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >On Thursday 29 July 2004 05:52 am, Brian Harring wrote: > > > >>Policy states files over 20k are not to be commited- I'll be committing > >>the logic to enforce this shortly- files over 20k will be viewed by > >>repoman as a failed check. > > > >just so you guys know, the answer is NOT to compress them and add them > >back into the tree > > There seem to be rather a lot of those already: > > find /usr/portage/*-* -regex '.*\.\(tgz\|tbz2\|gz\|bz2\)' > > Is there a specific policy about not having compressed file in the tree? > If I'm not mistaken, a gz'ed or bz2'ed file in portage is sort of > pointless, since the rsync enables compression. Maybe repoman could > complain about .gz, .bz2, .tgz, or .tbz2 files in the tree as well? What about not allowing binary files at all? -- \ Georgi Georgiev \ No line available at 300 baud. \ / chutz@gg3.net / / \ +81(90)6266-1163 \ \ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list