From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug voting
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:07:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040728000717.7a610845@snowdrop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4106DC03.8080104@kolumbus.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2067 bytes --]
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:49:39 +0300 Tommi Pirinen
<tommi.pirinen@kolumbus.fi> wrote:
| The main deal with this whole discussion to me as end user seems that
| gentoo's bugzilla has gotten very much of the reputation that bugs
| just sit there without no one noticing. As you might have noticed this
| concern comes up a lot in the user fora and granted, the reason might
| be the stupidity of users, but I'm sure it won't go away soon. Most of
| the people complaining about it do report at other projects as well,
| and from my and their experience other projects do have quite a lot
| better response times from bugzilla than gentoo does. Of course this
| bug voting wouldn't be much of help to the actual problem, more than
| just slowdown for the most eager bug reporters.
I've been flamed by a couple of users for not adding a broken gtk-2 file
selector patch to gvim. There're several "please add my horridly broken
ebuild for this lame package which is full of bugs and unmaintained
upstream" bugs which I'd love to close as WONTFIX, but past experience
has shown that it's generally easiest to just leave them alone. Closing
a bug as WONTFIX really upsets some people, no matter what the reason.
If I ignore a bug instead, chances are no-one's gonna know that I'm the
person to flame :)
| >Good example: the automagic link detection before DHCP feature that
| >people keep on wanting in baselayout. Looks nice on the surface, lots
| >of people saying "yes please", but suddenly when it's implemented we
| >get thousands of users with broken networking because it turns out
| >that that nifty link detection feature isn't universally reliable.
| >
| So it's users' fault that someone implemented and released broken
| feature?
No no. It's that people keep on submitting patches for a thing which we
already know is broken, despite there being existing bugs documenting
why it ended up not working.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox)
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-27 16:54 [gentoo-dev] Bug voting Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 17:04 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 17:21 ` Chris Bainbridge
2004-07-27 17:27 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 17:39 ` Peter Johanson
2004-07-27 17:54 ` Olivier Crete
2004-07-27 18:20 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-27 18:41 ` Lance Albertson
2004-07-27 17:59 ` Jason Rhinelander
2004-07-27 19:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-07-27 18:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 18:18 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 18:45 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 19:26 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 20:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 20:23 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-27 20:29 ` Spider
2004-07-27 20:37 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 21:39 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 22:24 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 22:59 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 23:12 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28 7:06 ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-27 22:49 ` Tommi Pirinen
2004-07-27 23:07 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2004-07-27 23:46 ` Tommi Pirinen
2004-07-28 6:55 ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-28 7:52 ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-07-27 23:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:41 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:48 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:52 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28 0:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-28 0:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-28 0:10 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28 0:08 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-07-28 0:14 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28 0:09 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28 0:21 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28 0:30 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 21:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " David Sparks
2004-07-27 23:01 ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-07-28 3:48 ` Kumba
2004-07-27 19:49 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-07-27 19:53 ` Lance Albertson
[not found] ` <4108A16D.9090508@butsugenjitemple.org>
[not found] ` <4108ECA5.1020102@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <4108F3A5.1000505@butsugenjitemple.org>
2004-07-29 13:11 ` Lance Albertson
2004-07-29 15:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-07-29 17:50 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-30 2:41 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-30 4:00 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-30 11:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-08-06 10:09 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
2004-07-27 20:09 ` [gentoo-dev] Bug voting++ Frank van de Pol
2004-07-27 21:09 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28 0:26 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug voting Joel Konkle-Parker
2004-07-28 2:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Gardiner
2004-07-28 3:11 ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-07-28 6:55 ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-28 14:12 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28 23:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Joel Konkle-Parker
2004-07-29 0:38 ` Dylan Carlson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-27 18:17 [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040728000717.7a610845@snowdrop.home \
--to=ciaranm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox