public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dylan Carlson <absinthe@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug voting
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:24:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407271824.48472.absinthe@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040727223904.524c952f@snowdrop.home>

On Tuesday 27 July 2004 5:39 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> I'd hardly call 30,000 emails and however many forums posts there are
> "nothing".

Wasn't it you who called them the "vocal minority"?   

In any event, they are our users... and ultimately the more, simple tools 
we can give users to let us know what they think is important, the better 
we are able to prioritize what gets worked on -- particularly enhancements 
to our tools.

> No, subtle as in "this bug will cause people various really strange
> problems, but they won't realise what's causing it". Don't forget, the
> package maintainers quite often know a lot more about the package and
> the way it interacts with the system than the bug submitters and voters.

Right, a completely isolated case.   As a package maintainer should know 
more than most users.  But ultimately, most bugs (that haven't been closed 
out as INVALID/etc) are either problems with the way something works now, 
or an enhancement request.   You think that votes get cast for stupid 
things?  Do you really think our users are stupid? 

Go on, look at KDE's bug system w/votes, or Mozilla's for that matter.

I'll save you the trouble:

KDE defects with votes: http://tinyurl.com/c5ja
KDE enhancements with votes: http://tinyurl.com/c5j3
Mozilla bugs with votes:  http://tinyurl.com/59dxl

Do those bugs that have votes look like a waste of time to you?  The users 
for KDE, Mozilla, etc use the voting system responsibly and I believe ours 
will too.

> Well, either the voting affects developers, in which case it's a serious
> problem because it'll detract from the bugs which are *actually*
> important, or it won't affect developers, in which case your claims
> above are effectively meaningless.

It won't influence any developers (like you) who choose to ignore the 
votes.  For others, it will be a tool like any other (severity, priority, 
etc) to help determine what needs attention.  It's not a mandate.

For developers such as yourself, what are you worried about?  Ignore the 
votes and keep working on your buglist like you normally would.  I fail to 
see the problem here.

Cheers,
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@gentoo.org]
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-27 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-27 16:54 [gentoo-dev] Bug voting Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 17:04 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 17:21   ` Chris Bainbridge
2004-07-27 17:27   ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 17:39     ` Peter Johanson
2004-07-27 17:54       ` Olivier Crete
2004-07-27 18:20         ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-07-27 18:41           ` Lance Albertson
2004-07-27 17:59       ` Jason Rhinelander
2004-07-27 19:31         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-07-27 18:07     ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 18:18       ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 18:45         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 19:26           ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 20:09             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 20:23               ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-27 20:29               ` Spider
2004-07-27 20:37               ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-27 21:39                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 22:24                   ` Dylan Carlson [this message]
2004-07-27 22:59                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 23:12                       ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28  7:06                         ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-27 22:49                   ` Tommi Pirinen
2004-07-27 23:07                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-27 23:46                       ` Tommi Pirinen
2004-07-28  6:55                         ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-28  7:52                           ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-07-27 23:26                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:41                     ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:48                     ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 23:52                     ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28  0:02                       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-28  0:08                         ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-28  0:10                         ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28  0:08                       ` Jon Portnoy
2004-07-28  0:14                         ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28  0:09                       ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28  0:21                         ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-28  0:30                           ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-07-27 21:06               ` [gentoo-dev] " David Sparks
2004-07-27 23:01             ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-07-28  3:48             ` Kumba
2004-07-27 19:49 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-07-27 19:53   ` Lance Albertson
     [not found]     ` <4108A16D.9090508@butsugenjitemple.org>
     [not found]       ` <4108ECA5.1020102@gentoo.org>
     [not found]         ` <4108F3A5.1000505@butsugenjitemple.org>
2004-07-29 13:11           ` Lance Albertson
2004-07-29 15:14             ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-07-29 17:50               ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-30  2:41                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-30  4:00                   ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-30 11:05                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-08-06 10:09   ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
2004-07-27 20:09 ` [gentoo-dev] Bug voting++ Frank van de Pol
2004-07-27 21:09   ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28  0:26 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug voting Joel Konkle-Parker
2004-07-28  2:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Gardiner
2004-07-28  3:11   ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-07-28  6:55     ` Tom Wesley
2004-07-28 14:12     ` Dylan Carlson
2004-07-28 23:58       ` [gentoo-dev] " Joel Konkle-Parker
2004-07-29  0:38         ` Dylan Carlson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-27 18:17 [gentoo-dev] " Brian Harring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200407271824.48472.absinthe@gentoo.org \
    --to=absinthe@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox