From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17529 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 12:11:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 12:11:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BohqH-0002j9-BY for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:11:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 20827 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2004 12:11:00 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 3639 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 12:11:00 +0000 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:14:14 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.82 References: <200407251342.09843.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <107B2834-DE2E-11D8-B5A6-000D93283962@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <107B2834-DE2E-11D8-B5A6-000D93283962@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407252114.14496.jstubbs@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] macos mess X-Archives-Salt: bd4ef4ea-d512-4eba-84e9-66ba99d0c9a6 X-Archives-Hash: a6ef08c411936be648452d85f5f910ac On Sunday 25 July 2004 20:30, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote: You said nothing that eases any of my concerns. Why is it closed? You mentioned "we" a few times - who is this "we"? But, honestly, I don't care any more. The chance is once it does become open, it'll be found to be full of bugs as per the norm. One question.. If you are capable of writing a super portage that does all that portage does and more, why couldn't you fix one little bug that held up your beloved macos release for over a year that was fixable in less than one hour? Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list