From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] macos mess
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:56:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407241956.47777.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8DD1D809-DDC9-11D8-B5A6-000D93283962@gentoo.org>
On Saturday 24 July 2004 07:31 pm, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
> I've changed my mind. I'm not going to change the virtual file
> semantics in the MacOS profiles to get repoman to stop complaining.
> Instead I wrote a small (4 lines) patch for repoman which does the
> folowing:
>
> When repoman detects a macos-specific unsatisfied dependency it will
> check the packages.build file
that's a pretty ugly hack
are you suggesting we do this with every new random arch we add that isnt a
standard linux port ? seems like an unintuitive workaround
why not push something a little more intelligent ... perhaps a new file for
portage to utilize in cases like this ... the profile has a special file
where you can define packages that are assumed to be satisified
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-24 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-24 11:34 [gentoo-dev] macos mess Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
2004-07-24 16:54 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-24 16:59 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-24 17:58 ` Travis Tilley
2004-07-24 18:36 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-24 19:10 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-24 19:24 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-24 19:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-24 19:58 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-24 23:31 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-24 23:56 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2004-07-25 0:21 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-24 20:54 ` Joshua Brindle
2004-07-24 22:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-24 23:18 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-24 23:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-24 23:51 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-24 23:58 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-25 0:25 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-25 0:03 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-25 0:34 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-25 1:28 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-25 15:53 ` Alastair Tse
2004-07-25 19:57 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-26 0:07 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: New drivers category in portage (Was [gentoo-dev] macos mess) Daniel Ostrow
2004-07-25 21:38 ` Gavin
2004-07-26 1:57 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-07-26 2:46 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: New drivers category in portage (Was[gentoo-dev] " Gavin
2004-07-25 1:26 ` [gentoo-dev] macos mess Jason Stubbs
2004-07-25 2:22 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-25 2:50 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-25 3:38 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-25 4:42 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-25 5:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-25 11:36 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-25 8:25 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-25 8:48 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-25 11:39 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-25 11:30 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
2004-07-25 12:14 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-07-25 13:19 ` Jason Stubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407241956.47777.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox