From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19675 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 13:32:39 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Jul 2004 13:32:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bndgc-0004cu-0j for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:32:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 11278 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2004 13:32:37 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 16595 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 13:32:36 +0000 From: Stuart Herbert Reply-To: stuart@gentoo.org Organization: Gentoo Linux Project To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:32:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407221037.26106.stuart@gentoo.org> <200407221153.36619.stuart@gentoo.org> <20040722125503.GI24932@mail.lieber.org> In-Reply-To: <20040722125503.GI24932@mail.lieber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_yH8/AcEEubLNr5s"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407221432.34759.stuart@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A new 'arches@gentoo.org' alias for bugzilla? X-Archives-Salt: 96510ed4-56e4-4bbf-b91c-863f3955428f X-Archives-Hash: abe49650c76035ef08a2016089a0f55a --Boundary-02=_yH8/AcEEubLNr5s Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 22 July 2004 13:55, Kurt Lieber wrote: > Assuming baselayout has all the arches that folks are currently working o= n, > that gives us a list of: > > x86 ppc sparc mips alpha arm hppa amd64 ia64 ppc64 s390 Isn't that list missing the bsd and the macos arches? > What is the problem we're trying to solve here? a) There doesn't seem to be a definitive list of ARCH's to assign bugs to (and the list changes anyway). I don't like guesswork. b) Adding a cc per arch per bug is time consuming and error-prone. c) There doesn't seem to be a definitive way to file bugs for ARCH's and marking packages as stable d) Assigning bugs to 'arch-maintainers@g.o' will result in too much email for the people who read it Best regards, Stu =2D-=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.o= rg Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.or= g/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diar= y/ GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C =2D- --Boundary-02=_yH8/AcEEubLNr5s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBA/8HyDC+AuvmvxXwRAtJFAJ49WSN0tBXC1rl3NPZpidhmIR+NIQCgpSyU E7YngC/YKG1/AQVCQTtkwCk= =FAlo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_yH8/AcEEubLNr5s--