From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17022 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 10:53:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Jul 2004 10:53:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BnbCo-0000IA-At for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:53:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 18040 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2004 10:53:41 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21354 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 10:53:41 +0000 From: Stuart Herbert Reply-To: stuart@gentoo.org Organization: Gentoo Linux Project To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:53:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407221037.26106.stuart@gentoo.org> <40FF8BE0.8050208@gentoo.org> <1090490459.12436.10.camel@cid.outersquare.org> In-Reply-To: <1090490459.12436.10.camel@cid.outersquare.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_wy5/ANRpWmy8pou"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407221153.36619.stuart@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A new 'arches@gentoo.org' alias for bugzilla? X-Archives-Salt: b4039b6f-862c-455b-8b15-80bc17047c69 X-Archives-Hash: bfe23f810fb8efbc1edadd6b679662f6 --Boundary-02=_wy5/ANRpWmy8pou Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 22 July 2004 11:00, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > I believe that's what he meant... but I'm against using arches@g.o for > that sort of thing because it will generate useless spam for arches that > don't need to be notified... plus most arch maintainers won't notice > those bugs because they're not assigned to their arch... they don't want > to dig through all the arches@ bug reports to find ones that pertain to > them still... > > Plus, if you assign it to the arches, they can remove themselves from > the bug once they have taken care of it for their arch and not be > bothered by it any more... Well, having to manually add all the arches by hand is error-prone. Plus,= =20 just keeping track of all the arches isn't easy either. No-one maintains a= =20 list of valid arches + aliases on www.g.o (have you *seen* how out of date= =20 the Project Listing is atm?). So, I'm sorry about the inconvenience this might cause the arch teams, but = not=20 having an alias like this seems more inconvenient for the rest of the devs = =2D=20 ie the majority of us. Best regards, Stu =2D-=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.o= rg Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.or= g/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diar= y/ GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C =2D- --Boundary-02=_wy5/ANRpWmy8pou Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBA/5ywDC+AuvmvxXwRAmSwAJ4nKJXz9QXIAiLellyaJOsDpvs7kwCfTjUM LwBls43oek8EKPQd/XTGwVs= =zwF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_wy5/ANRpWmy8pou--