From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-14168-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 26833 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 23:25:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Jul 2004 23:25:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BmL1p-0008FA-Np for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 23:25:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 22286 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jul 2004 23:25:09 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19642 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 23:25:09 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 00:22:38 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20040719002238.13da8996@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200407181853.29488.lv@gentoo.org> References: <cd9kuv$j9e$1@sea.gmane.org> <20040717013218.659bcdd9@snowdrop.home> <200407181353.52245.absinthe@gentoo.org> <200407181853.29488.lv@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__19_Jul_2004_00_22_38_+0100_9N+XcBse8=/xJe6a" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread X-Archives-Salt: 8b3dae59-f15e-4dfe-97ca-9c7a791dac9e X-Archives-Hash: 4f09445048abef65e5bb3331d200b945 --Signature=_Mon__19_Jul_2004_00_22_38_+0100_9N+XcBse8=/xJe6a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:53:29 -0400 Travis Tilley <lv@gentoo.org> wrote: | > Do we have a plan to deprecate devfs or do we plan to support both | > udev and devfs indefinitely? If we can get some agreement on how | > profiles should be handled in the future (referencing our previous | > thread on static profiles and things like GLEP19), I think it would | > make sense to standardize on udev going forward. | | please dont force udev on me... i refuse to use that crap. :| Well, unless you write something else yourself, you won't have much choice once 2.7 comes along... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Mon__19_Jul_2004_00_22_38_+0100_9N+XcBse8=/xJe6a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA+wZE96zL6DUtXhERAmB0AJwNGj1R6/ey2o4v6Ma+Wp1spz06uQCgzzdv q+D4CmtNVjWQXh6rPMd2BEc= =br0s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__19_Jul_2004_00_22_38_+0100_9N+XcBse8=/xJe6a--