From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9394 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 18:12:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Jul 2004 18:12:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BmG9P-0006a3-2q for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:12:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 27777 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jul 2004 18:12:38 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26409 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 18:12:38 +0000 Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:10:04 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20040718191004.182cea5c@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200407181353.52245.absinthe@gentoo.org> References: <20040717000619.GA8494@kroah.com> <20040717013218.659bcdd9@snowdrop.home> <200407181353.52245.absinthe@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__18_Jul_2004_19_10_04_+0100_BR6+4DMB=39IWTmM" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread X-Archives-Salt: 8a7f11ac-8353-4376-8e22-d4ae8efaafd7 X-Archives-Hash: 4e8d00ba172b1974d2a22296fe01f8e8 --Signature=_Sun__18_Jul_2004_19_10_04_+0100_BR6+4DMB=39IWTmM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [ argh! resend to list this time... yay for inconsistent mailing list headers and a few strange people who get upset with Cc:s :) ] On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:53:52 -0400 Dylan Carlson wrote: | Do we have a plan to deprecate devfs or do we plan to support both | udev and devfs indefinitely? If we can get some agreement on how | profiles should be handled in the future (referencing our previous | thread on static profiles and things like GLEP19), I think it would | make sense to standardize on udev going forward. Well, that can't happen across the board until 2.6.x works on everything. OTOH, it'd be nice if we started suggesting udev (without that wretched tarball hack) for anyone running 2.6.x. Aside from one rather nasty 64bit-related b0rkage, udev's been doing very nicely. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Sun__18_Jul_2004_19_10_04_+0100_BR6+4DMB=39IWTmM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA+rz+96zL6DUtXhERAjxeAKCSGASAGQihfywzEHSkkp1+ZF8MNgCeJRGp sExKugzZkNiro8jsbPbyfHY= =ekRE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__18_Jul_2004_19_10_04_+0100_BR6+4DMB=39IWTmM--