From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 365 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 17:53:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Jul 2004 17:53:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BmFrH-0001an-K5 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:53:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 22677 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jul 2004 17:53:55 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29132 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 17:53:54 +0000 From: Dylan Carlson Reply-To: absinthe@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:53:52 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040717000619.GA8494@kroah.com> <20040717013218.659bcdd9@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20040717013218.659bcdd9@snowdrop.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407181353.52245.absinthe@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread X-Archives-Salt: 0e4bd6f0-7353-47cc-93d1-cad71546972f X-Archives-Hash: e6e0daada1114e61a57acc42aa1d1eff On Friday 16 July 2004 8:32 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > No, supermount is just pointless, since we've got udev and dev.d, but > it's cleanly =Nable and off by default so I doubt many people really > care. The objectionable patch is bootsplash. Chances are everyone's > already heard wesolows' rant about this, and I agree with everything he > says, so I won't repeat it here. Do we have a plan to deprecate devfs or do we plan to support both udev and devfs indefinitely? If we can get some agreement on how profiles should be handled in the future (referencing our previous thread on static profiles and things like GLEP19), I think it would make sense to standardize on udev going forward. Cheers, Dylan Carlson [absinthe@gentoo.org] Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list