From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16667 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 06:28:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Jul 2004 06:28:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bm5A3-0003iP-CN for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 06:28:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 29327 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jul 2004 06:28:34 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19584 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 06:28:34 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 02:28:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040718022325.A2570@netdirect.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040718022325.A2570@netdirect.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407180228.41251.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Using stow inside portage X-Archives-Salt: 51432f4f-bd14-4009-b184-c13b70acf008 X-Archives-Hash: 1b92ca89329d451cd257757f3e00a529 On Sunday 18 July 2004 02:23 am, Chris Frey wrote: > I'm sure there are ebuilds that don't rely completely on econf() and > friends, and these would be harder to update. Is there anything else > I'm missing? why bloat econf ? an eclass sounds better ... `stow-eclass` ... then again i know nothing of stow except for what i've read in your e-mail :) -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list