From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21521 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2004 13:42:42 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Jul 2004 13:42:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bk14r-0001ZA-Mg for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:42:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 19242 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jul 2004 13:42:41 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20281 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2004 13:42:40 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:42:44 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040712005404.10F1215A3C@orm.localnet> <20040712102051.11a4cf95.acid.punk@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040712102051.11a4cf95.acid.punk@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407120942.44663.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords X-Archives-Salt: fec714a6-1036-4170-8825-ab4c64d7c68a X-Archives-Hash: 374f54fd18b2025cbb55d8c0bdeaa7f4 On Monday 12 July 2004 04:20 am, Alexander Futasz wrote: > > * if ebuild appends $RDEPEND or $DEPEND to $RDEPEND or $DEPEND to > > $DEPEND. > > Why is this bad (specifically appending $DEPEND to $RDEPEND)? $DEPEND -> $RDEPEND isnt wrong assuming it's done in the correct order RDEPEND="$RDEPEND blah" DEPEND="$DEPEND blah" those are wrong -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list