From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-13975-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 32612 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2004 15:12:41 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jul 2004 15:12:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BjJWo-0001FE-H1 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:12:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 3203 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jul 2004 15:12:38 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7357 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2004 15:12:37 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:10:18 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20040710161018.6fbb4e64@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200407100941.54651.tradergt@smelser.org> References: <200407091106.23915.tradergt@smelser.org> <200407092317.59894.tradergt@smelser.org> <200407101253.37097.arutha@gmx.de> <200407100941.54651.tradergt@smelser.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__10_Jul_2004_16_10_18_+0100_TuX3lsiLZnWBK5wY" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: 307966eb-41fa-4e5b-81c6-442ac83f208d X-Archives-Hash: 772bb72f6c49ca7520e7cb1ceda55543 --Signature=_Sat__10_Jul_2004_16_10_18_+0100_TuX3lsiLZnWBK5wY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:41:54 -0500 Jeff Smelser <tradergt@smelser.org> wrote: | I am reading it now, yes. He also stated he will move it before 30 | days because he uses it, and needs it. So basically, what I am | seeing, is if its important enough for the dev, then they forget the | 30 day rule. If its not, they don't.. No, we do what is appropriate for the package. As a guideline, thirty days is a reasonable duration for ~arch for non-core packages. For very small changes (for example a simple ten line patch), thirty days may be too long. For core packages, or complex packages with a lot of dependencies, thirty days is often not long enough to find all the associated issues. For security related issues, we either backport or ignore the thirty days depending upon which seems more appropriate. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Sat__10_Jul_2004_16_10_18_+0100_TuX3lsiLZnWBK5wY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA8Abc96zL6DUtXhERAoiZAKC94N73AkhimPIVx0WGEhQBh60q4wCbBFrI 3kQ0mPV8dMPKmYd/ASADCAA= =ytxI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__10_Jul_2004_16_10_18_+0100_TuX3lsiLZnWBK5wY--