From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-13947-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 6348 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 23:58:25 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jul 2004 23:58:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bj5G4-0000nc-Qz for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:58:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 24434 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2004 23:58:24 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25271 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 23:58:24 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:56:24 -0700 From: Greg KH <gregkh@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040709235624.GB9044@kroah.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407091512440.5899@stargazer.weeve.org> <200407091820.36454.vapier@gentoo.org> <20040709223015.GB6610@kroah.com> <200407091836.35973.vapier@gentoo.org> <20040709230807.GA8305@kroah.com> <20040709233923.GD31999@violet.grantgoodyear.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040709233923.GD31999@violet.grantgoodyear.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] kernel team: please make up your mind X-Archives-Salt: 79a750d1-d329-40f6-9cd5-6f943c5247c1 X-Archives-Hash: 9714782d08eba60118bd7dc49cea5623 On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 07:39:23PM -0400, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Greg KH wrote: [Fri Jul 09 2004, 07:08:07PM EDT] > > And we need to shake out any bugs that 2.6 might cause people, other > > distros have already switched, why not gentoo also? > > Because we don't have to? That sounds flip, but I don't really mean it > that way. No, I agree with you. It's just that there really isn't anyone supporting the current 2.4 kernel package anymore :( But that's a different issue... And there is no new developer effort happening there on the mainline kernel.org kernel for the most part. thanks, greg k-h -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list