From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-13947-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 6348 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 23:58:25 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jul 2004 23:58:25 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bj5G4-0000nc-Qz
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:58:24 +0000
Received: (qmail 24434 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2004 23:58:24 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 25271 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 23:58:24 +0000
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:56:24 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <20040709235624.GB9044@kroah.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407091512440.5899@stargazer.weeve.org> <200407091820.36454.vapier@gentoo.org> <20040709223015.GB6610@kroah.com> <200407091836.35973.vapier@gentoo.org> <20040709230807.GA8305@kroah.com> <20040709233923.GD31999@violet.grantgoodyear.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040709233923.GD31999@violet.grantgoodyear.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] kernel team:  please make up your mind
X-Archives-Salt: 79a750d1-d329-40f6-9cd5-6f943c5247c1
X-Archives-Hash: 9714782d08eba60118bd7dc49cea5623

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 07:39:23PM -0400, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Greg KH wrote: [Fri Jul 09 2004, 07:08:07PM EDT]
> > And we need to shake out any bugs that 2.6 might cause people, other
> > distros have already switched, why not gentoo also?
> 
> Because we don't have to?  That sounds flip, but I don't really mean it
> that way.

No, I agree with you.  It's just that there really isn't anyone
supporting the current 2.4 kernel package anymore :(

But that's a different issue...

And there is no new developer effort happening there on the mainline
kernel.org kernel for the most part.

thanks,

greg k-h

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list