From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24766 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 22:32:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jul 2004 22:32:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bj3uW-0000Lr-NR for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 22:32:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 20479 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2004 22:31:52 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13081 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 22:31:52 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 15:30:15 -0700 From: Greg KH To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040709223015.GB6610@kroah.com> References: <20040709215832.GA6155@kroah.com> <200407091820.36454.vapier@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407091820.36454.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] kernel team: please make up your mind X-Archives-Salt: 965641c9-0954-418e-b5a0-e8cfde248c3f X-Archives-Hash: 9ce85d2f2b13a6ae2b4e3e2539c4137c On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 06:20:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 09 July 2004 06:17 pm, Jason Wever wrote: > > > > > - development-sources are clean kernel.org kernels > > > > Isn't this what vanilla-sources is for? > > yes and no > vanilla is for 2.4 There's a 2.0 and 2.2 kernel in there too, how do people handle those? > development is for 2.6 What's going to happen when 2.7 is released? > we havent merged them via SLOT because portage would cause a lot of users to > 'upgrade' to 2.6 and we dont want that kind of bug reports on > forums/bugzilla/mailing lists That wouldn't be such a bad thing to force to happen anyway :) thanks, greg k-h -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list