From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-13934-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 24766 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 22:32:20 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jul 2004 22:32:20 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bj3uW-0000Lr-NR
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 22:32:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 20479 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2004 22:31:52 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 13081 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 22:31:52 +0000
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 15:30:15 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <20040709223015.GB6610@kroah.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407091512440.5899@stargazer.weeve.org> <20040709215832.GA6155@kroah.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407091614320.5899@stargazer.weeve.org> <200407091820.36454.vapier@gentoo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200407091820.36454.vapier@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] kernel team:  please make up your mind
X-Archives-Salt: 965641c9-0954-418e-b5a0-e8cfde248c3f
X-Archives-Hash: 9ce85d2f2b13a6ae2b4e3e2539c4137c

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 06:20:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 09 July 2004 06:17 pm, Jason Wever wrote:
> > > > > 	- development-sources are clean kernel.org kernels
> >
> > Isn't this what vanilla-sources is for?
> 
> yes and no
> vanilla is for 2.4

There's a 2.0 and 2.2 kernel in there too, how do people handle those?

> development is for 2.6

What's going to happen when 2.7 is released?

> we havent merged them via SLOT because portage would cause a lot of users to 
> 'upgrade' to 2.6 and we dont want that kind of bug reports on 
> forums/bugzilla/mailing lists

That wouldn't be such a bad thing to force to happen anyway :)

thanks,

greg k-h

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list