From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7188 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 23:57:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jul 2004 23:57:47 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bj5FS-0002ik-G2 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:57:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 25034 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jul 2004 23:57:45 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20870 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2004 23:57:45 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 19:57:44 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040709232251.GC31999@violet.grantgoodyear.org> <20040709233225.GA8727@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20040709233225.GA8727@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407091957.44357.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Too many kernels? X-Archives-Salt: 95f768ef-8387-4140-9a14-c20df2cabb4e X-Archives-Hash: aadc57527b1666b0e7014935ba9e2573 On Friday 09 July 2004 07:32 pm, Greg KH wrote: > The patchset specific ones are (in my opinion) pretty much pointless. > Sure, some people like them, but it seems like a strange way to track a > -mm or -aa or -ck kernel using a ebuild. But that's just my opinion. i think tracking patchsets which can be found via kernel.org is ok ... makes life easy to not have to d/l the linux tarball and patchsets yourself all the time ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list