From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-13850-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 19950 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2004 16:08:01 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 16:08:01 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BibRH-0005Po-Ma
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:07:59 +0000
Received: (qmail 16724 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2004 16:07:59 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 24922 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2004 16:07:58 +0000
From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@gentoo.org>
Reply-To: stuart@gentoo.org
Organization: Gentoo Linux Project
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:07:53 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200407080929.17773.stuart@gentoo.org> <200407081611.39078.stuart@gentoo.org> <20040708154126.GF9362@orange-pc.ces.clemson.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20040708154126.GF9362@orange-pc.ces.clemson.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_cFX7A2Lsdz59G7J";
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200407081707.56746.stuart@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Revised: net-www break-up list
X-Archives-Salt: 156b914c-ddb3-4a6c-be08-dc80be296bb7
X-Archives-Hash: e42908fdc069fe30d716d5116118a01a

--Boundary-02=_cFX7A2Lsdz59G7J
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 08 July 2004 16:41, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> For what it's worth, I also argued that php (the language itself) should
> be in dev-lang, not dev-php, so using similar reasoning for mod_python
> doesn't really appeal to me.  Just as the languages are in dev-lang, I
> feel that the language-specific apache modules should be in www-apache
> (with the caveat that mod_php should probably remain in dev-php because
> that's the preferred choice of the php folks).

Hrm.  The whole dev-lang debate is an issue that I think will run as long a=
s=20
there is a Gentoo.  It's not something I'm looking to resolve with this=20
re-org.

I think the best thing to do is this.  If a mod_* maintainer wants to put h=
is=20
mod_* package into www-apache rather than dev-<lang>, then okay - provided=
=20
Zul also agrees to this.  Apache's his thing after all.

Best regards,
Stu
=2D-=20
Stuart Herbert                                              stuart@gentoo.o=
rg
Gentoo Developer                                       http://www.gentoo.or=
g/
                                                   http://stu.gnqs.org/diar=
y/

GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319  C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
=2D-

--Boundary-02=_cFX7A2Lsdz59G7J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBA7XFcDC+AuvmvxXwRAju4AJ9J9oKZDIbuH7uVPfbR7xh2U3EmpgCgr/eR
jFfobVbYAG/lAxxhWv7FnUo=
=nRW/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_cFX7A2Lsdz59G7J--