From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15846 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2004 22:21:03 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Jun 2004 22:21:03 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BeLXi-0002u9-MI for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:21:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 16361 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jun 2004 22:21:02 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4539 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2004 22:21:01 +0000 From: Travis Tilley Reply-To: lv@gentoo.org Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:25:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406252255.59046.lv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406261425.28976.lv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtauls for libstdc++-versions? X-Archives-Salt: c7432668-9ace-46bd-93e8-688391d81fe8 X-Archives-Hash: 50832ec67ca768561c09b4b4ea784807 On Saturday 26 June 2004 03:15 pm, Sven K=F6hler wrote: > why should everybody have libstdc++-v3 installed? just some ebuilds that > install pre-compiled software will depend on specific libstdc++ versions. if you make me a comprehensive list of every binary c++ app/plugin in the=20 portage tree linked against the old libstdc++, i'll update their=20 dependencies. however, i dont assume anyone maintaining an app will=20 automatically realise that this dependency is needed if using gcc 3.4... an= d=20 there are a -lot- of ebuilds that would need updating, most of which arent= =20 even supported on my arch (so i cant test and dont want to touch them=20 myself). perhaps spanky's idea of just slamming another binary into=20 lib-compat is a good one... > there also another point: somebody having gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3 installed > doesn't need libstdc++-v3 too, and the gentoo-way of solving that is to > use virtuals. true. but using profiles is a useful solution until we can get to -every-=20 binary in the tree. :) i even have a new dev on x86 who's interested in working on gcc-porting bug= s=20 and getting x86 ready for gcc 3.4: morfic. so this might be much more of an= =20 issue in the not-so-distant future... and one i will shamelessly drop in hi= s=20 lap. mwuahahahaha, it's good to have minions =3DD =2D-=20 Travis Tilley -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list