public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Glover <jmglov@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-web-user] Hardened PHP now in Gentoo
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 08:30:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040519123036.GC23494%jmglov@jmglov.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1084966200.9124.18.camel@rivendell>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1762 bytes --]

Quoth foser (Wed 2004-05-19 01:30:00PM +0200):

> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 21:08 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> 
> > I'm pro-choice, and do not agree with the idea of aggregating USE flags just 
> > because they sound similar.
> 
> The second time you mention choice. I guess we know what Gentoo is about
> by now, the 'choice' argument is too often used just to end criticism.
> 
> Choice is an illusion, if you there's too much choice it is no use to
> anyone anymore, because nobody really knows what it is all about. This
> is already the case with the loads of USE flags/portage options/etc. we
> have. Gentoo shouldn't be about choice for the sake of it, it should be
> about simplicity/managability : stuff that works. It's a trade-off.

That is ridiculous. Speaking from personal experience, choice is exactly
what drew me to Gentoo--I could have it *just* how I wanted it. Thus,
choice is *not* an illusion, it is vital to many advanced users who
have chosen Gentoo for just that reason.

The way to achieve "simplicity/managability : stuff that works" is
through reasonable defaults. Look at all the USE flags that xfree or
xemacs use. Quite a glut. However, the defaults are almost always what
I need. If I care enough, I can run 'equery uses' to find out what the
more esoteric flags do, and select or deselect flags based on that.

If I want things to Just Work(TM), I accept the Gentoo defaults,
knowing that the devs would never lead me down the wrong path. :)


-- 
Josh Glover

Gentoo Developer (http://dev.gentoo.org/~jmglov/)
Tokyo Linux Users Group Listmaster (http://www.tlug.jp/)

GPG keyID 0xDE8A3103 (C3E4 FA9E 1E07 BBDB 6D8B  07AB 2BF1 67A1 DE8A 3103)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DE8A3103

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-19 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-17 23:34 [gentoo-dev] Hardened PHP now in Gentoo Stuart Herbert
2004-05-18  7:38 ` Alexander Gabert
     [not found] ` <40A9AC46.1070500@wildgooses.com>
2004-05-18 17:45   ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-web-user] " Stuart Herbert
2004-05-18 18:16     ` Marius Mauch
2004-05-18 20:08       ` Stuart Herbert
2004-05-19 11:30         ` foser
2004-05-19 12:30           ` Josh Glover [this message]
2004-05-19 14:09             ` foser
2004-05-19 16:13               ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-20 15:52                 ` foser
2004-05-20 21:10                   ` [gentoo-dev] Some numbers Stuart Herbert
2004-05-20 22:30                     ` foser
2004-05-21 21:58                       ` Stuart Herbert
2004-05-23 17:20                         ` Grant Goodyear
2004-05-19 16:06           ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-web-user] Hardened PHP now in Gentoo Jon Portnoy
2004-05-19 17:26             ` Olivier Crete
2004-05-19 17:38               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-05-19 17:53               ` Jon Portnoy
     [not found]                 ` <1548.213.101.226.144.1084990759.squirrel@TesterServ.TesterNet>
2004-05-19 18:34                   ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-19 18:54                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-05-19 17:56               ` Allen Dale Parker
2004-05-19 18:01                 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-19 18:24                   ` Allen Dale Parker
2004-05-20 16:12                   ` foser
2004-05-19 18:00               ` [gentoo-dev] Local USE Flags and Gentoo Handbook (was: Re: Hardened PHP now in Gentoo) Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3)
2004-05-20  7:40               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-web-user] Hardened PHP now in Gentoo oford
2004-05-19 17:44             ` Caleb Tennis
2004-05-19 17:57               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-05-19 18:29                 ` Caleb Tennis
2004-05-20  1:46               ` [gentoo-dev] USE flag explosion Jason Stubbs
2004-05-20  5:48               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-web-user] Hardened PHP now in Gentoo Georgi Georgiev
2004-05-19 18:06           ` Stuart Herbert
2004-05-19 18:41             ` Joshua Brindle
2004-05-19 18:48               ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-20 16:41                 ` foser
2004-05-19 19:52               ` Stuart Herbert
     [not found]                 ` <20040519232308.GD14148@tompayne.org>
2004-05-19 23:49                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris PeBenito
2004-05-20  0:02                     ` Tom Payne
2004-05-20  0:10                       ` Max Kalika
2004-05-20  0:40                       ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-05-20 12:58                 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-web-user] " John Nilsson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-19 17:11 Troels Vognsen
2004-05-19 17:50 Troels Vognsen
2004-05-19 18:32 Olivier Crete

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040519123036.GC23494%jmglov@jmglov.net \
    --to=jmglov@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox