From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27026 invoked from network); 18 May 2004 18:15:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by parrot.ussg.indiana.edu with SMTP; 18 May 2004 18:15:40 +0000 Received: from parrot.ussg.indiana.edu ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQ98s-0006dr-5b for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 18:16:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 25296 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2004 18:15:39 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8673 invoked from network); 18 May 2004 18:15:39 +0000 Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 20:16:28 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20040518201628.703a7b34@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <200405181845.58966.stuart@gentoo.org> References: <200405180034.30388.stuart@gentoo.org> <40A9AC46.1070500@wildgooses.com> <200405181845.58966.stuart@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Linux X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: H@&[wkk?l:Zx:8i_5bViK&{Vz{c{~r),^&:v/r#+X5dmfA6qCl)~'Ul{"&06Q1[05.%v&c>je5R{=xLnx^=~lN~rO0xuR~~NY)CX\"Nc4$9CBPwDl-.pYuVeGdir86L@\:j?7@%Ej2?Wi-Y0=1]T14ce0w79Bckk[*ti{;iA"{;I}&E~.msRBsBS)N!CS4Gd|_UR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__18_May_2004_20_16_28_+0200_eMc5kanmO0AUZ_Nu" X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-web-user] Hardened PHP now in Gentoo X-Archives-Salt: 2203754b-1716-4281-9369-2a1eb3d8abb8 X-Archives-Hash: 6388ab39003377964f6de6d5b0d3f01c --Signature=_Tue__18_May_2004_20_16_28_+0200_eMc5kanmO0AUZ_Nu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/18/04 Stuart Herbert wrote: > On Tuesday 18 May 2004 07:25, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > > Why not just "use hardened"? Do we really need yet another USE > > flag?(There are more flags than packages these days...) > > Because 'hardened' means something else. Gentoo's all about choice. And that's exactly the point about local USE flag bloat I posted a few days ago. Why do we need a new flag for this? I would compare the descriptions, but I don't find one for hardenedphp in use*.desc :( Actually I don't see the flag anywhere (including the mod_php and php ebuilds). If it has to do with security enhancements I think the hardened flag would be a perfect match unless the Gentoo Hardened team is disagreeing completely (and as pappy already asked the same question I don't think so). Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. --Signature=_Tue__18_May_2004_20_16_28_+0200_eMc5kanmO0AUZ_Nu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAqlMIWzrL1pM7SNcRAkN+AJ4ni6lembltaoEfV/HPwvsvKDeHawCfSRWc RAq0febFtVWa24Hg3rWPl2M= =MOq9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__18_May_2004_20_16_28_+0200_eMc5kanmO0AUZ_Nu--