From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27629 invoked from network); 18 May 2004 11:03:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by parrot.ussg.indiana.edu with SMTP; 18 May 2004 11:03:09 +0000 Received: from newton.random-chaos.org.uk ([195.82.107.148]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQ2OI-0007l3-0D for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 11:04:10 +0000 Received: from parrot.ussg.indiana.edu ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by newton.random-chaos.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.21) id 1BQ1qz-0006Z8-Pe for arch-gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 11:29:45 +0100 Received: (qmail 1216 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2004 11:02:42 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8818 invoked from network); 18 May 2004 11:02:41 +0000 X-Authenticated: #14792761 Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:59:17 +0200 From: Alexander Futasz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20040518125917.1aba6fe4.acid.punk@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200405171951.32745.gentoo-dev@gnosys.biz> References: <793F9D20-A427-11D8-AC04-0003939E069A@mac.com> <200405130706.12534.gentoo-dev@gnosys.biz> <20040513155409.GA15192@kroah.com> <200405171951.32745.gentoo-dev@gnosys.biz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Major MCE problem with SMP on Gentoo kernels X-Archives-Salt: c0dac0ab-f963-4700-a8b2-ae46ecc3162b X-Archives-Hash: 4988d9c3ebd6fe48d695cfaf8d180ebd On Tue, 18 May 2004 04:29:58 -0400, Kevin wrote: > Again, thanks to all who have commented on this thread. I've now done > some more testing and have some other interesting (though also > confusing) results to report. > > On Thursday 13 May 2004 11:54, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 07:06:12AM -0400, Kevin wrote: > > > Greg KH thinks it's bad memory, > > > > It's not only me, it's memtest86 saying it :) [...] > You're right, Greg. I finally took your advice and did some serious > testing with the DIMM sticks. [...] > In every case, memtest86 v3.0, memtest86 v3.1a, memtest86+ v1.0 all > behave very similarly. That is [...] the program locks up. > > In all of the memory configurations I tried, the Dell utilities > reported no memory errors (or any other hardware errors). I think you missed this one reply to your posts: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/17942 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list