From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9814 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 14:41:39 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 May 2004 14:41:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BOdsY-0006E4-TL for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 14:41:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 13399 invoked by uid 50004); 14 May 2004 14:41:38 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8379 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 14:41:38 +0000 Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 15:40:00 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20040514154000.4e6fa603@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <40A45028.5040700@scms.waikato.ac.nz> References: <20040514021143.GU26837@gentoo.org> <40A45028.5040700@scms.waikato.ac.nz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__14_May_2004_15_40_00_+0100_XwOTnQl8r9eiN3pY" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2004 14:41:39.0715 (UTC) FILETIME=[90FC6D30:01C439C1] Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Alternative names for binaries in app-text/cook and dev-util/cook X-Archives-Salt: aaca4576-acf5-4cb4-baea-ffb600d8fa12 X-Archives-Hash: 35ff115d68b4a01af2ac0efc491bf107 --Signature=_Fri__14_May_2004_15_40_00_+0100_XwOTnQl8r9eiN3pY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 14 May 2004 16:50:48 +1200 Barry Shaw wrote: | Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: | > Hi Gentoonies. | > | > Both app-text/cook and dev-util/cook install the binary | > /usr/bin/cook. This is of course less than ideal. | > | | I thought that all of the ebuilds in portage were supposed to have | unique package names. I seem to recall reading this somewhere in the | gentoo docs but I have been unable to find it again. Not really. That's why we have categories. -- Ciaran McCreesh, Gentoo XMLcracy Member G03X276 (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Fri__14_May_2004_15_40_00_+0100_XwOTnQl8r9eiN3pY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFApNpF96zL6DUtXhERAmRqAKDEouuh0nHKFC2iIp6rHVf2fP0JFgCdFa+c ccx4eLSQl3ASZrgVK8uaCBc= =g5sB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__14_May_2004_15_40_00_+0100_XwOTnQl8r9eiN3pY--