From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 10:30:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405031030.16829.pauldv@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1083564905.8372.3.camel@TesterTop.tester.ca>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 03 May 2004 08:15, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 07:10, John Nilsson wrote:
> > While on the topic:
> > Is it resonable to patch gdm so that /etc/init.d/xdm is zapped
> > after gdm is killed by selecting reboot/shutdown from the login
> > screen? It just annoys me that the script errors while shutting
> > down.
>
> This is imho a misfeature of the current initscripts system. The
> started-ness of an application is only checked against a file and not
> against the current real status. We should probably add a possible
> "status()" function to them (that would default to true) that would
> check if the service is still running in a custom way.. And zap it if
> it isnt... The problem there is with dependencies, should they be
> stopped if the service died? But the current system is clearly
> broken..
I agree, I think we should enhance the init scripts with another function
that can check the status of a daemon (in some way) and as such also
does not complain when a died daemon needs to be started.
Paul
- --
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAlgMYbKx5DBjWFdsRAmOTAKDnA9E0PAVsCtMFAFJIkeKbLuJX/ACcDoCK
k3gzkzUnrA0n2unCEEpERH0=
=+tIc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-03 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-02 17:32 [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence William Hubbs
2004-05-03 5:10 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-03 6:15 ` Olivier Crête
2004-05-03 6:46 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-03 17:22 ` Grant Goodyear
2004-05-03 8:30 ` Paul de Vrieze [this message]
2004-05-03 8:50 ` Allen D Parker
2004-05-03 9:05 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-05-05 18:11 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-05-03 16:24 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 15:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 15:33 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 16:00 ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 16:30 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-04 15:16 ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 15:37 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 15:59 ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 16:25 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-07 16:33 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-05-07 17:53 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 16:28 ` Daniel Drake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-02 11:40 [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405031030.16829.pauldv@gentoo.org \
--to=pauldv@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox