From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 12:32:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040502173223.GA7160@linux1.home> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote:
> hi,
>
> gentoo usually does the following if i execute halt or reboot:
>
> sending all processes the TERM signal
> sending all processes the KILL signal
> stopping xdm ...
> stopping alsasound ...
> etc....
>
> in may eyes, this has to be the other way round:
> first shutdown all deamons properly with the init.d-script, and than
> send the remaining processes the TERM and KILL signals.
>
>
> why does gentoo handle things the way it does? redhat etc. do it the
> other way i described. using the init.d-script sounds more resonable to me.
I just confirmed this. When you do a shutdown or a reboot or halt, the processes are killed by the kill and term signals before the services are actually stopped with the /etc/init.d/* scripts.
Is there a reason for this or should it be the other way around?
William
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAlTCnblQW9DDEZTgRAhpFAKCHZKYcQ7pf3cW8k8cFSIwCSYOOxACfWb3z
FwWqFEXh6xyd6I8prHhvi6E=
=31D5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2004-05-02 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-02 17:32 William Hubbs [this message]
2004-05-03 5:10 ` [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence John Nilsson
2004-05-03 6:15 ` Olivier Crête
2004-05-03 6:46 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-03 17:22 ` Grant Goodyear
2004-05-03 8:30 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-05-03 8:50 ` Allen D Parker
2004-05-03 9:05 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-05-05 18:11 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-05-03 16:24 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 15:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 15:33 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 16:00 ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 16:30 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-04 15:16 ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 15:37 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 15:59 ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 16:25 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-07 16:33 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-05-07 17:53 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 16:28 ` Daniel Drake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-02 11:40 [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040502173223.GA7160@linux1.home \
--to=williamh@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox