public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 12:32:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040502173223.GA7160@linux1.home> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote:
> hi,
> 
> gentoo usually does the following if i execute halt or reboot:
> 
> sending all processes the TERM signal
> sending all processes the KILL signal
> stopping xdm ...
> stopping alsasound ...
> etc....
> 
> in may eyes, this has to be the other way round:
> first shutdown all deamons properly with the init.d-script, and than 
> send the remaining processes the TERM and KILL signals.
> 
> 
> why does gentoo handle things the way it does? redhat etc. do it the 
> other way i described. using the init.d-script sounds more resonable to me.

I just confirmed this.  When you do a shutdown or a reboot or halt, the processes are killed by the kill and term signals before the services are actually stopped with the /etc/init.d/* scripts.

Is there a reason for this or should it be the other way around?

William
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAlTCnblQW9DDEZTgRAhpFAKCHZKYcQ7pf3cW8k8cFSIwCSYOOxACfWb3z
FwWqFEXh6xyd6I8prHhvi6E=
=31D5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-02 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-02 17:32 William Hubbs [this message]
2004-05-03  5:10 ` [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence John Nilsson
2004-05-03  6:15   ` Olivier Crête
2004-05-03  6:46     ` John Nilsson
2004-05-03 17:22       ` Grant Goodyear
2004-05-03  8:30     ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-05-03  8:50       ` Allen D Parker
2004-05-03  9:05         ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-05-05 18:11           ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-05-03 16:24 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 15:13   ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 15:33     ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 16:00       ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 16:30         ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-04 15:16   ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 15:37     ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 15:59       ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 16:25         ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-07 16:33           ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-05-07 17:53             ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 16:28         ` Daniel Drake
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-02 11:40 [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040502173223.GA7160@linux1.home \
    --to=williamh@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox