From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19727 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2004 21:38:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Apr 2004 21:38:52 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BDs5s-0001qd-5Z for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:38:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 30568 invoked by uid 50004); 14 Apr 2004 21:38:52 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28368 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2004 21:38:51 +0000 From: Elfyn McBratney Organization: EMCB To: stuart@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:37:00 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200404100446.56864@i.emcb.co.uk> <200404142200.45957@i.emcb.co.uk> <200404142233.59913.stuart@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200404142233.59913.stuart@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200404142237.01469@i.emcb.co.uk> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] re2c woes - badly broken with gcc 3.x - offering help, possible ebuild maintainership X-Archives-Salt: 3c3abe3a-69f0-42bb-848d-fe72a324a3c9 X-Archives-Hash: 61c0675a74a2e2d22ef35ba25d791fbb =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 14 Apr 2004 21:33, Stuart Herbert wrote: > On Wednesday 14 April 2004 23:00, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > OK, I have something.. the only problem I see is that the re2c.org > > people won't be doing releases. They'll be working from CVS only.=20 > > Marcus Boerger asked this: > > > > ". . .It would also be nice if gentoo could go with RPMs we provide > > from CVS now (see README.in file)." > > Heh - that Marcus from the php.net dev team? Figures ;-) Yep ;) > > I replied to Marcus saying that I'd ask (but that I was doubtful anout > > using RPM's :) > > We can do that. Look at nxserver.eclass - that's one example that does > this. There are probably better ones in the Portage tree ;-) > > > I'm working on a new ebuild that uses a cvs snapshot (to be downloaded > > from a distfiles mirror) that would seem the most logical way to go..=20 > > the only problem with that is that a dev will have to update the snap > > every couple of weeks/month. 8) > > We can do that instead. I guess it comes down to how often they plan on > updating the RPMs - and whether there are any binary compatibility > problems. CVS snapshots might just be the way to go. Well at the moment, there aren't even RPM's to update ;) I think they'll b= e=20 working completely from CVS, so if you wanted an RPM it'd be a DIY job. :) > Is there anything we can do to help you right now? I'm just testing my ebuild, so if that works, it might be bug #43449 closin= g=20 time :) Elfyn =2D --=20 Elfyn McBratney, EMCB mailto:elfyn@emcb.co.uk http://www.emcb.co.uk/ PGP Key ID: 0x456548B4 PGP Key Fingerprint: 29D5 91BB 8748 7CC9 650F 31FE 6888 0C2A 4565 48B4 "When I say something, I put my name next to it." -- Isaac Jaffee >> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ << << ~ Linux london 2.6.5-emcb-241 #2 i686 GNU/Linux ~ >> >> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ << =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAfb0MaIgMKkVlSLQRAs7AAJwLhWuSOH3ykyo1Pp6tJBLh+tCoJQCfVaqe fhK7nvzKCwsRvJqIENLAkpM=3D =3DfCQh =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list