[gentoo-dev] New version, same ~arch?

[gentoo-dev] New version, same ~arch?

[Dominik Stadler]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

I have a quick question that I could not answer by looking through the docs:

If I add a new (minor) version of an application, should I keep all the arches
that were listed before (marking them as unstable with ~) or should I list 
only those arches on which I can test the ebuild (i.e. ~x86 in my case)?

Thanks... Dominik.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAdIrSBy2+bgx1H+0RAgztAJ42ByRv9auGb/9o4W5UcYnbnp2E9gCgumFR
WncVC9eQshQ1liJu8WMj/MQ=
=feue
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New version, same ~arch?

[Mike Frysinger]

On Wednesday 07 April 2004 07:12 pm, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> If I add a new (minor) version of an application, should I keep all the
> arches that were listed before (marking them as unstable with ~) or should
> I list only those arches on which I can test the ebuild (i.e. ~x86 in my
> case)?

keep the same arch's in the KEYWORDS, just change them all to ~
-mike

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New version, same ~arch?

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 551 bytes --]

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 01:12:18 +0200 Dominik Stadler
<dominik.stadler@gmx.at> wrote:
| If I add a new (minor) version of an application, should I keep all
| the arches that were listed before (marking them as unstable with ~)
| or should I list only those arches on which I can test the ebuild
| (i.e. ~x86 in my case)?

For minor changes, keep the keywords but switch to ~arch. For anything
with substantial changes, ask for someone on the arch teams to test.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail:    ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web:     http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]