From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-10512-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 9705 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 05:38:05 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 05:38:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Au3MT-0002v4-Fx for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 05:38:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 23407 invoked by uid 50004); 20 Feb 2004 05:38:05 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 624 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 05:38:04 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:37:53 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <1076987863.15233.27.camel@localhost> <1077253191.10578.1.camel@localhost> <200402200524.50672.luke7jr@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <200402200524.50672.luke7jr@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_20ZNA6jgXSn6KLK"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402200037.58775.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license X-Archives-Salt: 5c5bb122-821c-4d90-8721-848bbb3dafb7 X-Archives-Hash: 08637cdde0bb9142421de2467d223623 --Boundary-02=_20ZNA6jgXSn6KLK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 20 February 2004 12:24 am, Luke-Jr wrote: > Perhaps Portage should be able to look at the licenses used by packages and > detect incompatibilties then... perhaps we just dont add this crap to our tree that's what donnie's doing and i for one strongly support him -mike --Boundary-02=_20ZNA6jgXSn6KLK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQDWdNkFjO5/oN/WBAQL4Vw/9E/lfNR60eqr5XOCenL7UQwAODT2Ap5KA Lbhi6ECRnNiyWF1HnU5DlWO8N0CdFTB8PxQUBPpNks5mKIF9aR8ujXILj0SLd86/ EhBMFW5yliYOudsrDwH/cxxr/ekUlkZnznXRTQVZwHpXOxh75OKyC0qzAcPtoBW2 xd46xzTkXrS8Xn5yPvhwRORVDas5vEK5qRI7rcV4jV5RYyvqVnBxXU5AADQdUzgY WeBckQrxdYoKRDPjYIUqYHx21nvZI3Ln5QLzsGhqPCNH3oqNnqtSQhUEiATC/65G p0tWRkJSRA7O4i/1FfewPDiswh+qE3PwYdGfFsokhjzYtKC/CC+Z3/hDf5iuU2AV 2wqKbUi/2s6XBERPhB3pB1FRG3YIapGFDd4PeZPqWvgEZ5PTAkXWe/JjmVBHhaZ0 nW4lA/Ep9U2+vCEGhGluZEkBWs5G2itMzJMJOqHcL5vSI1bQYfcbVwrnxYAs9cxq 2yr3TTIz4DwEKvrUBl8V+qJEp4xSy+d0r8jqgiRU45oY65scJuxgdJ0TdqcQ7UOP r2TDRr9zEITLSSmOdhk7Y0VqSTPAaquBB7K/az9ZGYPTq2zQSv45+jADN/7KJS8x 4Teys3i6GR26dd50pP0wxjJtt/moeHR9cpSUnsvpLzQ+GQaHMJ3fDXkcNf6oVqa4 Azsk1+9E1s4= =3Ggb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_20ZNA6jgXSn6KLK--