On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:02:23AM -0500, in
<20040127080223.GB5541@dev.gentoo.org>, Blake Matheny <jake@gentoo.org>
wrote:
> Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis?
> > I think dev-cl doesnt tell much, might be better to have something like
> > dev-clisp.. and while we're at it.. dev-lisp...
> Not what I was suggesting. As seemant said, I think a good direction to go
> would be lisp-clisp, lisp-scheme, etc as the game categories have done.
I know convention states that categories will be named <type>-<subtype>
and, by the "games" precedent, split into <subtype>-<subsubtype> when
necessary. Is there anything that actually stops us from using more than
one dash in a category name? I can see that this opens a huge can-o-worms,
but how about dev-lisp, dev-lisp-clisp, dev-lisp-scheme, etc.?


-- 
Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"?
Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action.
  --Ghost in the Shell