On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:07:01PM -0600, in
<87ptd61qcq.fsf@killr.ath.cx>, Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@gentoo.org>
wrote:
> Brian Friday <bfriday@lasierra.edu> writes:
> > applications today. I would argue there is a pretty good
> > reason to keep any "Scheme" interpreters in lisp even if it
> > is rather tedious.
> 
> Yes, but dev-lisp is already chockers with common lisp stuff, so that
> won't do.
If the objective is to choose a name for the category which accurately
describes its intended contents, I suggest "dev-lispscheme. One
alternative, just off the top of my head, would be to use "dev-scheme"
and drop a README in the Portage tree root directory which describes
what each category is supposed to contain and points to other detailed
documentation.

-- 
Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"?
Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action.
  --Ghost in the Shell