Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis?
> What about a dev-commonlisp category then? Like there is app-emacs
> (resp. app-vim) for emacs (resp. vim) packages, whereas other editors
> goes to app-editors.
Unfortunately I think the most correct solution isn't one that's available.
What would be correct, is having dev-scheme and dev-cl categories as sub
categories of dev-lisp, since technically Scheme and CL are both dialects of
Lisp. However this isn't an option. Creating dev-commonlisp is no better of a
solution than creating dev-scheme imho.

-Blake

-- 
Blake Matheny
jake@gentoo.org                  Computer Science is merely the post-Turing
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jake/     decline in formal systems theory.
http://mkfifo.net/gpg.key