From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16960 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 10:40:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 10:40:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AeXal-00065o-Im for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:40:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 13883 invoked by uid 50004); 8 Jan 2004 10:40:42 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 32753 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 10:40:42 +0000 X-Authenticated: #14792761 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:41:56 +0100 From: Alexander Futasz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20040108114156.7583199d.acid.punk@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040107163601.GA16315@cerberus.oppresses.us> References: <200401071613.51986.C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk> <20040107163601.GA16315@cerberus.oppresses.us> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution? X-Archives-Salt: 42aaaa59-d4ce-4674-be3f-d9517cc4e84a X-Archives-Hash: e3354b1e9729748b3bfd214018a282a1 On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:36:01 -0500, Jon Portnoy wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:13:51PM +0000, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > > Daniel Robbins said in August: > > > > In another post in that thread, he said that he had consulted with his > lawyer and dual copyrights were, indeed, a bad idea. Can you please link us? I didn't found this. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list