From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19241 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2004 19:24:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Jan 2004 19:24:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AeJHp-0002Jf-U6 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 19:24:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 22983 invoked by uid 50004); 7 Jan 2004 19:22:07 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20774 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2004 19:22:07 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:22:50 +0100 From: Karl Trygve Kalleberg To: Paul Varner Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040107192250.GH1994@boblycat.org> References: <20040107141941.GE1994@boblycat.org> <1073500277.21988.44.camel@garath.local.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1073500277.21988.44.camel@garath.local.domain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Karl Trygve Kalleberg Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre1 almost available for testing X-Archives-Salt: 6be279cd-87dc-43d5-a58a-faf134a8eb89 X-Archives-Hash: 373da18583effac61d160ef23ad7c1a6 On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:31:17PM -0600, Paul Varner wrote: > On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 08:19, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: > > > Since I'm real interested in the Gentoolkit package, I'm willing to test > and play with this. The question I have before I do so is what if > anything can I expect to break by unmasking and installing > portage-2.50_pre10? Nothing, I should think. At least we haven't experienced any major regressions with that one. etcat in gentoolkit-0.1.37 won't work with the portage 2.0.50 series, but apart from that, I think most things should work. There may be some stray debugging output left in portage, but that's harmless. Kind regards, Karl T -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list