[gentoo-dev] USE flag for inet/daemon build ?

[gentoo-dev] USE flag for inet/daemon build ?

[Meir Kriheli]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I'm working on a SuperServer build for dev-db/firebird. SuperServer is the 
standalone daemon, while Classic (current build method) is the inet one.

Is there some USE flag which sets inet or daemon behavior ?  euse -i lists 
none.

Cheers
- -- 
Meir Kriheli
MKsoft systems
http://www.mksoft.co.il
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/8YkbRkS5DWK1mZkRAuRYAKDi/XaO5tiL7Y0l3Zaiapv58ItgUQCgwQXv
C1cab21VAKnHOb3J6N1DLTE=
=6d5/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag for inet/daemon build ?

[Spider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 824 bytes --]

begin  quote
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:18:00 +0000
Meir Kriheli <mksoft@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm working on a SuperServer build for dev-db/firebird. SuperServer is
> the standalone daemon, while Classic (current build method) is the
> inet one.
> 
> Is there some USE flag which sets inet or daemon behavior ?  euse -i
> lists none.

At one time I think we had an xinetd USE flag, but I'm not sure what
happened to that....

it would be nifty feature for builds to tag that as on/off and if on,
at least install a working xinetd.d/<foo> service.

This adds for more "out of the box"   "things work" feeling

//Spider

-- 
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag for inet/daemon build ?

[foser]

On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:02, Spider wrote:

> At one time I think we had an xinetd USE flag, but I'm not sure what
> happened to that....
> 
> it would be nifty feature for builds to tag that as on/off and if on,
> at least install a working xinetd.d/<foo> service.
> 
> This adds for more "out of the box"   "things work" feeling

I think there was this whole discussion on this exact thing on -dev (?)
once and i think the general consensus back then was that it was not up
to Gentoo to provide optional support if it is not offered by the
upstream application itself or something. Someone dive into the archives
:)

- foser


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag for inet/daemon build ?

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 417 bytes --]

On Tuesday 30 December 2003 16:36, foser wrote:
> I think there was this whole discussion on this exact thing on -dev (?)
> once and i think the general consensus back then was that it was not up
> to Gentoo to provide optional support if it is not offered by the
> upstream application itself or something. Someone dive into the archives

i say if a developer cares or if a user submits the file go for it ...
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]