From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29911 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2003 10:33:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Dec 2003 10:33:45 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AaYEz-0006ea-Aa for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:33:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 20900 invoked by uid 50004); 28 Dec 2003 10:33:44 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7601 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2003 10:33:44 +0000 Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:33:35 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-Id: <20031228103335.1c100d56@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200312281026.19457.mike@gaima.co.uk> References: <20031227223417.017c75e4@voyager.weeve.org> <200312281026.19457.mike@gaima.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__28_Dec_2003_10_33_35_+0000_NT_FQPtMgs7wgeqS" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2003 10:33:56.0241 (UTC) FILETIME=[18A8C810:01C3CD2E] Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion: virtual/telnet X-Archives-Salt: 6245f4f2-797f-4086-9592-877d1797789f X-Archives-Hash: e38ce06c6d3093caa5b38de98a7e0b7a --Signature=_Sun__28_Dec_2003_10_33_35_+0000_NT_FQPtMgs7wgeqS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:26:18 +0000 Mike Williams wrote: | The block-telnet with a virtual/telnet is a good idea. A simple 1 line | reason for the block printed when portage shows the block would make | things even better. | Yes, it's work for a dev, but if it saves a multitude of questions | later isn't it worth the effort now? Not really. That's some pretty heavy abuse of virtuals and ebuilds. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Sun__28_Dec_2003_10_33_35_+0000_NT_FQPtMgs7wgeqS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/7rGG96zL6DUtXhERAivRAJwJoBsXmYVumXVBVFm+8fSiGVopvQCfZJ0L VY6e60dkSsvt/BbW5hmfqwU= =8B39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__28_Dec_2003_10_33_35_+0000_NT_FQPtMgs7wgeqS--