From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2252 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2003 09:15:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Dec 2003 09:15:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AaX0w-0003u3-W5 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 09:15:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 19016 invoked by uid 50004); 28 Dec 2003 09:15:09 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 30079 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2003 09:15:08 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 04:14:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200312271651.16995.caleb@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200312271651.16995.caleb@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_a8p7/eJpgqMd7sF"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200312280415.06042.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild inheritance question X-Archives-Salt: 1bac6ba1-af67-4dba-a2dc-ca8baa4c34f5 X-Archives-Hash: 6caa1d791163594a8f454bab1e180051 --Boundary-02=_a8p7/eJpgqMd7sF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 27 December 2003 16:51, Caleb Tennis wrote: > In trying to track down some of the dependency problems/mess in the KDE > stuff, I come to you with a question: > Sorry if this is stupidly obvious, but it's not addressed in the docs and > nobody has been able to answer the question thus far. it's not stupid nor is it really a 'someone screwed up big' ... newXdepend has some history behind it but it seems you only care about the= =20 now ... i think danamark will have some issues when he gets back but i hope= =20 that it turns out well ... the way dependencies work right now with respect to eclasses is pretty=20 simple ... eclasses ALWAYS use newdepend, newrdepend, newpdepend, newcdepend ... they= =20 should NEVER have DEPEND=3D or similar ... flip side of the coin is that ebuilds should not be using the newXdepend, t= hey=20 should be using DEPEND=3D ... i think thats clear enough so i'll leave this alone ;) =2Dmike --Boundary-02=_a8p7/eJpgqMd7sF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAP+6fGUFjO5/oN/WBAQK5exAA2NAmNP3tr3h86it9YZmurIFoFMoh6ohk oSOaN1xaVvcDvt5nyCCO7SzUs7mdQ2Bnf8E+Kd0WpBCITwlZUxIrWnnMDJ86YCwZ 6Xq5Pabe2ElMrYerWTesE01PuNB3mEZNmAkaGXgG/tmRG6CE8c8jArg9cbxPDW7w 9NvPxG6X2m2+/BMOXSTEBOoso/7jl3730RjMw7NnmkFUMZ7nwb86ddBZRZ40PuKB ni+ffNYPi4sktPF5v5Q/jxbK+UCUYr+thVy3FzyqdrAUcT4billjVBDQ0atcwRd9 Jw3DDdpkeBKeg7Ph9AcTj9flM2zjqJ2Y57wudhd5pUKv+ItSCgdOS6dADHruAm00 9X2i7I9st8g4t6l1SOKmi4QEwUgzEEaBuWUrAIVm4r4lfh2U/hKbdn+i67V6PO0F V0NxBPHCtR6b4+hzcM1sPC65Dmw5icmgTHVcMMPgCKv6QLAebeyyf0neOqekPudZ C9MRpUg8AAQZBLedMojat03HKrAtYRkZNqpBjO5dLNvIlbQnLvB9NIjQjM+7p09j BNMrM4ju3QKlxTlAuYFuXYhR1uR7M2Rd1vp5PzNyvLaL2gTd0Duid3cSciuU/Yod 70A8/4kr6QyfujsHSENsSTiG94R4jpRF2KdDROy7Zc1f515yREqv7mG9juec0v2i dsQgU1Aohq8= =YjIu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_a8p7/eJpgqMd7sF--