Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for production servers.

[Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1024 bytes --]

On Sunday 07 December 2003 21:15, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> On Sunday 07 December 2003 12:36 pm, Lisa Seelye wrote:
> > Valid enough concern.  However if I was building a series of Gentoo
> > servers that were to be as stable as could be I would go through the
> > portage tree and prune non-server stuff (such as x11-*) and then create
> > my own Portage tree to sync against.
>
> Yes, but can you expect every company to do this? Most don't know gentoo's
> in and outs like a dev's probably do. They just want something thats easy
> as possible to install, reliable and whatever other "buzz word" you want to
> throw in there..

It is gentoo-enterprise, not gentoo-stable. The thing is that the tree will 
not change. That does not in principle say anything about the stability of 
the packages themselves. (Although of course we will try to do some QA on 
them, and fix those that are really broken)

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]