public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for production servers.
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:16:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031206121630.GD1694@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sfd0985b.077@GroupWise>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1303 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:38:15PM -0500, Brett Simpson wrote:
> This quote was made by Daniel Robbins in an OSNews article.
> http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1080
> 
> "Gentoo Linux is currently a "bleeding-edge" type distro. It makes Gentoo
> Linux the ideal distribution for hobbyists who get lots of cool toys before
> everyone else, but makes Gentoo Linux a questionable choice for production
> server environments,"
[..]
> Since this was based off of Gentoo 1.0 how relevant is this for the
> current 1.4 release in a production server environment?

Gentoo Portage is already in use for production environments. It is not
Gentoo by itself, but nevertheless an important item.

http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/03/11/06/0254253.shtml

The reason I mention this here is because the use of Gentoo in production
server environments is restricted to the ability of the system administrator
to clearly define what he needs and doesn't need for his servers.

Portage is flexible enough to fit in almost every situation, and therefor
Gentoo is flexible enough too.

Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen

-- 
 ^__^   And Larry saw that it was Good.
 (oo)                                      Sven Vermeulen
 (__)   http://www.gentoo.org              Gentoo Documentation Project

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-06 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-05 19:38 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for production servers Brett Simpson
2003-12-05 19:51 ` Lisa Seelye
2003-12-05 20:10   ` Brett Simpson
2003-12-05 20:34     ` Brett Simpson
2003-12-05 20:45     ` Jon Portnoy
2003-12-05 21:33       ` Don Seiler
2003-12-05 22:34         ` Mike Williams
2003-12-06  3:20           ` Don Seiler
2003-12-06  3:34         ` Corey Shields
2003-12-06  3:30     ` Corey Shields
2003-12-07 10:45   ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-12-07 18:36     ` Lisa Seelye
2003-12-07 19:11       ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-12-08 18:25         ` david
2003-12-08 19:30           ` Lance Albertson
2003-12-07 20:15       ` Jeff Smelser
2003-12-16 22:13         ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-12-06 12:16 ` Sven Vermeulen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031206121630.GD1694@gentoo.org \
    --to=swift@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox