From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31928 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Dec 2003 16:34:17 -0600 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13605 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 16:34:17 -0600 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.0 From: Mike Williams To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 22:34:13 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <20031205204513.GA29185@cerberus.oppresses.us> <20031205213358.GB8394@linguo.lan.seiler.us> In-Reply-To: <20031205213358.GB8394@linguo.lan.seiler.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200312052234.13275.mike@gaima.co.uk> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for production servers. X-Archives-Salt: 1c8f9a82-80ea-42e1-b8f8-46aab36bd2df X-Archives-Hash: 70bab804384164cb4764d88c447bf213 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 05 December 2003 21:33, Don Seiler wrote: > I've mentioned this before but Oracle also only officially supports SUSE > and RHAS. Mainly because of the less "variable" (I suppose one could > say "fluid") nature of those distros. I can definitely see that point > of view. In my *very* limited experience of Oracle it's a whole hell of a lot easier= to=20 install it on Gentoo than RHAS. It just worked when I did it, with Redhat y= ou=20 had to do all sorts of silly little things. =2D --=20 Mike Williams =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/0QflInuLMrk7bIwRArm1AJ9ZgeHjTS5MsBibdDaEa6w9VNHd+QCgqddL R/8tpS8BKXrC+QPpVR50tiI=3D =3DjKgk =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list