From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19393 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Dec 2003 15:05:00 -0600 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26462 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 15:05:00 -0600 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:45:13 -0500 From: Jon Portnoy To: Brett Simpson Cc: Gentoo Dev Message-ID: <20031205204513.GA29185@cerberus.oppresses.us> References: <1070653863.12159.49.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> <200312051510.36537.simpsonb@hillsboroughcounty.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312051510.36537.simpsonb@hillsboroughcounty.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for production servers. X-Archives-Salt: 198d4649-0281-49be-988f-b06b1567013f X-Archives-Hash: f5a3592f0baad1ece3f6cf8b5674a99e On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 03:10:36PM -0500, Brett Simpson wrote: > > We are using Gentoo in a production server environment but recently management > has been asking questions mostly because Gartner only recommends SuSE or > Redhat Enterprise Linux. > Yeah, the same analyst group who has in the past claimed Windows has a lower TCO. I'd sure want to listen to them... 8) -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list