From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23026 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Nov 2003 10:55:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 23771 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2003 10:55:12 -0000 From: Peter Ruskin Organization: Retired To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:55:01 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031127043922.2b21b8c3.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20031127043922.2b21b8c3.genone@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311271055.01809.Peter.Ruskin@dsl.pipex.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] unmaintained app-portage packages X-Archives-Salt: 03e5bb68-ca71-449b-bc5c-c53cadb8e100 X-Archives-Hash: 27d5f6b2eb7e55aae3d64ec8328d63d4 On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 03:39, Marius Mauch wrote: > Hi all, > > The following packages are currently unmaintained upstream and I'd > like to drop them (package.mask'ing first and cvs removing after some > time) if noone steps up to do that: > > app-portage/kportage > app-portage/kemerge > app-portage/gentoo-stats > > kportage is already broken, the gentoo-stats service is down and > kemerge didn't have a new version for over a year is very likely > broken (didn't test it). > I thought one of the devs was going to pick up kportage. I know it's broken now but I would hate to see it sink without trace. Peter -- ====================================================================== Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.49-r15 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r3, 2.4.23_pre8-gss) i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+ ====================================================================== -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list