From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18693 invoked by uid 1002); 22 Nov 2003 14:57:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 847 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2003 14:57:48 -0000 X-WM-Posted-At: mailandnews.com; Sat, 22 Nov 03 09:57:48 -0500 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 23:57:30 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <20031122102805.GE1469@gentoo.org> <20031122144246.GA1927@foellmar.de> In-Reply-To: <20031122144246.GA1927@foellmar.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311222357.30558.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure X-Archives-Salt: 7bfd5c5d-fb5f-4a1b-9c60-6dc075861355 X-Archives-Hash: ae91de899ae85a344d54230be077e85c On Saturday 22 November 2003 23:42, Heiko Vogel wrote: > Does this thread ever reach an end ?! Sorry to continue it! ;-) I just want to say that, in posting, it was never my original intention to start of a fsf vs non-fsf debate. I'm surprised most many people have subscribed to it. In fact, if you look back to my original e-mail, my main reason for (re-)suggesting the idea was to prevent these sorts of debates! What can one do? ;-) Regards, Jason -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list