From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17289 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Nov 2003 01:51:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12781 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 01:51:08 -0000 X-WM-Posted-At: mailandnews.com; Thu, 20 Nov 03 20:51:07 -0500 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:50:59 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <200311191114.25081.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200311191114.25081.pauldv@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311211050.59578.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure X-Archives-Salt: f65da26e-5076-408c-83c4-c17fc6b1267b X-Archives-Hash: be6045dd24b980ca0bd9f2acf15baa7f Hello all, This question was posted to -user as well and has turned into a huge discussion. It seems that the key concern of the original poster is the free vs non-free bit. Several weeks (months?) ago there was a discussion of licenses with regard to id's software. In that, I suggested that a user need to accept all licenses before being able to install software. That was disregarded due to the fact that there are 100s (297) licenses in portage. However, users being forced to accept a license was implemented for the specific case of id's software. I again propose that this be made the default for all ebuilds (through portage rather than each ebuild). To counter the massive amount of licenses, I suggest having reasonable defaults for ACCEPT_LICENSES is make.defaults. The reason for this is that the free vs non-free questioning comes up on -user every month or two. Each time, the answer is invariably "you wont find what you're looking for here". I would prefer to be able to say, "sure, Gentoo can do that". And it seems if the above were implemented it would be as easy as ACCEPT_LICENSES="-* GPL-1 GPL-2 LGPL-2 LGPL-2.1". (I'm not so familiar with which licenses but I'm sure someone that cares would be). As a added benefit, using something similar to the above would ensure that a stage3 tarball would never be 'polluted'. I'm sure there would be other benefits, too. Regards, Jason -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list