From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17630 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Nov 2003 15:32:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13199 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2003 15:32:48 -0000 X-WM-Posted-At: mailandnews.com; Mon, 17 Nov 03 10:32:48 -0500 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:32:39 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <1068974673.361.2.camel@localhost> <1879.141.166.213.9.1069042689.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> <20031117160909.26d987a2.pYrania@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20031117160909.26d987a2.pYrania@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311180032.40391.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *-config tool renaming? X-Archives-Salt: 2b23613f-cdce-4779-8140-a339b4fa4c6f X-Archives-Hash: bedcf9edbb8047d91627049570b13b3d On Tuesday 18 November 2003 00:09, Markus Nigbur wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:18:09 -0500 (EST) > > "donnie berkholz" wrote: > > I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also > > for consistency. > > Ehrm, IMHO *-update should be scripts that don't need any user > interaction, like env-update or opengl-update (and yes, etc-update is an > exception; even so it should really be called etc-config. ;) Umm, in a sense opengl-update does need interaction - even if it's only passing command line parameters to the proggy. env-update is a different story; you just run it and it does it's thing. Personally, I would feel that opengl-update would be a good candidate to switch to config-. I can't think of too many that would fall into the update- class (using the "non-interactive" definition), but perhaps things like fixpackages? Regards, Jason -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list