From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1280 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Nov 2003 14:17:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8749 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2003 14:17:46 -0000 From: Gregorio Guidi To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:17:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: <1068974673.361.2.camel@localhost> <3FB83C69.9080805@gossamer-threads.com> <1879.141.166.213.9.1069042689.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> In-Reply-To: <1879.141.166.213.9.1069042689.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311171517.45977.g.guidi@sns.it> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *-config tool renaming? X-Archives-Salt: 83598a1e-c838-4761-986d-10997061a952 X-Archives-Hash: 0c8c833c259f1824748182a10c403442 On Monday 17 November 2003 05:18, donnie berkholz wrote: > >> What if we renamed all the *-config tools to config-* (gcc-config, > >> distcc-config, java-config, etc. would move to config-gcc, > >> config-distcc, config-java, etc.)? > >> > >> This would allow people trying to configure anything to simply type > >> config- and get a listing of what was available. > > I had imagined renaming anything that was *-update to config-* also for > consistency. > RedHat had a good thought when renamed all his config tools to redhat-config-. I'm thinking at an admin that comes from another distro and occasionally sits in front of a gentoo box, he could type gentoo- and get an idea of distro-specific tools. Bye. Gregorio Guidi -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list