From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11460 invoked by uid 1002); 16 Nov 2003 18:04:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22308 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2003 18:04:49 -0000 From: George Shapovalov Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:04:46 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <1068974673.361.2.camel@localhost> <200311161008.02180.iggy@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200311161008.02180.iggy@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311161004.47474.george@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-100000.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *-config tool renaming? X-Archives-Salt: a74754fe-1175-46d1-87ae-dc1be6538b6f X-Archives-Hash: 69d85c65de6c4cebe6ae69fbcfb45269 On Sunday 16 November 2003 08:08, Brian Jackson wrote: > On Sunday 16 November 2003 03:24 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > What if we renamed all the *-config tools to config-* (gcc-config, > > distcc-config, java-config, etc. would move to config-gcc, > > config-distcc, config-java, etc.)? > > Would also fix the possible collisions with tools that come with packages > that tell lib paths, etc. (i.e. gtk-config, kde-config, or the one that is > really getting in my way courier-config) > Then, while we are at it, why we also don't change config => setup (for example), in the hope that it will be more distinct? setup-gcc, setup-java.... This might also sound more like distro-tool rather than package-tool.. George -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list